|
|
#61 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 495
![]() |
Lawyers cost money....and plenty of it.
Good lawyers cost a fortune. Got no money to pay lawyers? Ya better get some fast, especially in a foreign country. The Corbys are still paying lawyers...lawyers have to pay the rent and eat too. Jonestown? ...is one person's writings....and a little careless with the truth he was proven to be in one section of it....not correct at all...so I didn't bother buying it. You know...if one part is inaccurate...how many other parts are. I was going to buy it , but I'd say I could guess most of what's in it already, having lived in the big city for many decades....and seen and heard many things....[a lot of which I wasn't supposed to]. Much of what is reported to be contained in the book has been in the public domain already...even if a while ago in time. .................................................. .................................................. ...................... Live and let live. "Sgt Schultz" wasn't the first person to adopt the "I see nothing, nothing" idea. Wise youth in the big city learnt that policy to survive. Having been virtually booted out of home after he left high school for protesting the Vietnam War, teen uluru lived in a flat he shared with 3 other men in the inner city ....yikes!...they were horrid...they looked normal, had good jobs, but never washed anything ...linen for example. He gravitated to Kings Cross in his spare time, [he had a 9-5 job]...the bright lights of the city...sleazeville....although it wasn't as sleazy in those days...more cosmopolitan/half sleazy. He often sat on the floor in the dim upstairs "club"/large room, and sang folk songs along with the "Peter Paul and Mary" type bands...the songs of protest...and chanted the peace mantra with the straight-haired hippy girls. Many things he saw at 2 am...people who were not supposed to be in sleazeville....but were. Drug deals, prostitution, loitering around the fountain [no one mentioned in a book, but a senior executive at uluru's corporation...yikes...uluru said nothing, of course, but received much favorable treatment in the workplace as a result]. And not only in sleazeville...but in respectibilityville....a famous footie player and another player's wife "relaxing" on the bonnet of a car in a darkened carpark, for example. "Live and let live" ...his mom taught him well. Unfortunately, some, innocent to the ways of the big bad world, learnt the hard way: http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/...478728965.html No 1 rule in the big city. "I see nothing, nothing/live and let live". That was then...today is now...5 minutes ago is history....and AJ supports Schapelle....and other causes to which the public seeks a favorable outcome....enough water to drink and bathe in , for example.....and favorable PTA's/freedom ....which is all that concerns me. Last edited by uluru : 03-11-2007 at 09:36 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | ||||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: BrizVegas
Posts: 605
![]() |
Corby worth every cent for Today Tonight
Date: Tuesday, 13 February 2007By Glenn Dyer Quote:
Quote:
http://www.crikey.com.au/Media/20070...y-Tonight.html |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 495
![]() |
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegrap...001021,00.html
ELIMINATED Dancing with the Stars contestant Naomi Robson has come to the defence of her embattled Today Tonight replacement Anna Coren. While side-stepping questions regarding the Mercedes Corby scandal currently dogging the Channel Seven current affairs program, Robson was quick to shield Coren from the controversy. "Anna is an incredibly competent journalist and I'm sure she's acquitting herself very well," Robson said. "To be honest I haven't had a chance to watch the program since I began Dancing with the Stars but obviously I read the papers, and I'm aware of what is going on. "It's all just part of the cut and thrust of current affairs – it's a very vibrant battlefield and both programs are really battling it out for supremacy at the moment," she said. While labelling the challenges of dancing on live television as "incredibly difficult", nobody knows the pressure of the Today Tonight hot seat like Robson, who successfully anchored the tabloid news program for more than a decade. From the Beaconsfield make-up truck to Papuan boy Wa-Wa, Robson publicly endured an incident packed year to forget as the host of Today Tonight during 2006. Robson took on Dancing with the Stars to shed her tough taboid TV image, and despite being voted off the program last night, Robson said the experience of being able to be herself on television had been a liberating one. "Shows like TT can be very one dimensional and I wanted to take a step back from that," she said. After lasting three weeks on the program, it was the journalist's paso doble performance which finally sent her packing. .................................................. .................................................. ....... It's a bunch of nasty rubbish...that's what it all is...fake stories, admitted lies, ambushes, innuendo, unsubstantiated allegations, breaches of privacy. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: BrizVegas
Posts: 605
![]() |
Speaking of the media --
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leech Leeches: The leeches are presumed to have evolved from the Oligochaeta, most of which feed on detritus. True leeches, of the subclass Euhirudinea, with both anterior and posterior suckers, are divided into two groups: 1. Rhynchobdellae: "jawless" leeches, armed with a muscular straw-like proboscis puncturing organ in a retractable sheath. 2. Arhychobdellids: Leeches which lack a proboscis and which may or may not have jaws armed with teeth. Leeches are hermaphrodites, meaning they are organisms that have both female and male reproductive organs. A Leech attaches itself when it bites, and it will stay attached until it has had its fill of blood. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leech So what's the difference? ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |||
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 47
![]() |
Quote:
:eek: Wow that was certainly a bolt from the blue ![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |||
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 47
![]() |
Quote:
It wasnt a cheap stab it was true confusion. I was reading the thread from the start to catch up and then the Ralph Fienes thing? It was like a commercial-it was actually entertaining though not really related to the Corbys. I do support Schapelle in the fact the she doesnt deserve 20 even if she is guilty. I have stated that before. Respected member? Who decides on that and if so have you actually met the person in real life? How can true respect be formed so easily when chances are that you have never met the person before? Both you and administration will agree that Ulurus comments at times will irk your other valued supporters at times because of his Indonesian stance in some posts. So you respect a person who displays these qualities? Respect should only be given if that other person truly respects others regardless of race, religion, sex etc. As for going away well I'm sure it would just easier to ban me? I realise this is a support Schapelle Corbys site and obvioulsy we come from different camps in terms of her guilt but you would be surprised that when the Corby news comes up with my mates (usually while drinking) even though they all think she's guilty I usually remind them that even if she is guilty that she doesnt deserve 20 yrs. Time served already is sufficient (I have that stated in another post). And then they will agree and some will even change there opinion and in there terms then some will say "she got rorted" in terms of the 20 yr sentence (perhaps not her guilt). Im a athiest but my mind is not that closed that I want people "to go away" just because they believe in something I dont. Talking to true believers can be quite interesting and I often joke to my mates that I will burn in hell if I am wrong. My sister attends a Catholic school but Im prepared to listen and help her with her religious studies (when she was younger) even though its essentially a opposing view of mine. And even if I did "go away" what would that achieve? As mentioned in other posts I think it was a recent poll that showed 93%? of aussies thought she was guilty? S#%@ how on earth is 93% of Australians supposed to go away? And where do we go anyway? Back to the mother country? Fair enough if your mission is too cocoon yourself in the Corby cause like a fanatic than your certainly on the right track. I dont know about you but if I had to tell my friends to "go away" because they were Catholics, Muslims or something I didnt believe in then my life would be less interesting. :) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 495
![]() |
I must've had a "brainstorm" that day when Ralph and Marissa appeared.
Think I was trying to point out that if one is not wised up to the ways of the world one can find oneself in "hot water/srife/big trouble" and getting used and abused/played. How did it relate to Schapelle? Maybe as Schapelle has said many times since her arrest that she regrets enormously not locking her bag. [not fully wised up to the ways of the big bad world of crooks and players]. Must've been quite a shock for Arthur to encounter that post in this thread. Think my posts are much more on topic in each thread as at today. Last edited by uluru : 03-15-2007 at 05:22 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | ||
|
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,487
![]() |
yes uluru I can tell you have been making an effort so thank you for that
everyone else, have I said before, please lets try to get along. Schapelle needs every supporter she can get. I can see how you can think schapelle is guilty and still think she needs a much lighter sentence but honestly that is not something we want to hear here. All it does is create arguments. People who join this site believe Schapelle is innocent. I need to make that even clearer than it already is.l |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|