Quote:
|
I'm about to reply to someone who posts as ADMIN. Need I say more?
|
What the hell does that mean. I am a supporter who runs this site. I am entitled to my opinion.
Quote:
|
While you use disjointed logic to evade issues I really hope you stop replying to my posts. Don't get me wrong, I love a good debate but when you lose your temper you lose the argument and you do that a lot, don't you?
|
You love a good debate that is very clear to me. You love a good debate so much you make up most of what you debate. Clever.
I havent lost any argument. You let me know when you have that article showing me where Roseleigh suggests the Bali Police planted the pot. You show me that. Until then it is just another one of your outright lies.
This statement was made in anger because it is not logical - it's not even important. Schapelle's exact statement was, "As soon as I opened the zipper.. Whoah.. (shakes head and screws up nose) you could smell it... it was... it stank" ... Liz Hayes: You could smell the marijuana? Schapelle: "oh yeah" - 60 minutes interview.
Quote:
|
Does this sound like the person behind her might have smelled it? Sounds right to me... But let's look at this ADMIN. How do you know the person behind her didn't smell it? Did you ask them? Because the gist of what I got from Schapelle and what I was trying to communicate was that it was a very obvious smell. Now, smell travels. How the hell could Schapelle have smelled it and not the people around her? How does that work ADMIN? Sure, smell dissapates but not when it's that concentrated. So what are you actually disagreeing with? That smell travels? Are you serious?
|
Here is your exact quote.
Quote:
|
In Schapelle's 60 minutes interview she stated that she smelled the marijuana before she saw it as did those in the immediate vicinity
|
. To me this quote suggests Schapelle said other people around her smelt the pot. Nowhere does Schapelle make any such statement. She says she smelt the pot and thats it. This therefore is a totally incorrect statement. Yet again. Not only can you not admit it but you have to insult me because I pointed it out.
So when you find the source of your information that is going to back up your claims that Schapelle's mother said the Bali police planted the pot in Schapelle's baggage you let me know ok. Make sure you present it with the source of the information that quotes Schapelle as saying people in her immediate vinicity also smelt the pot.
You cant just quote people as having said or done things they never said or done.
Quote:
|
ROFLMAO... What's the difference? Whether Schapelle deliberately took the marijuana to Bali or baggage handlers sent it there, neither is a glowing report on Australian airport security. So they didn't sacrifice Schapelle to hide poor security, did they? What they did do is allow Mathew Moore to claim that the streets of Kuta were flowing with Aussie Gold without making a peep. So unless Moore was suggesting that it got there by Australian fishing boats, there lack of comment suggests that they didn't care ENOUGH about the public perception of airport security to say, "The drugs never came from Australia!!!"
|
Your Assumption that because the government didnt respond directly to his claims means they though the drugs came from Bali is yet another of your wild and almost laughable links between fact and fiction.
These are your assumptions djwolf and your theories only. They all belong to you.
Quote:
|
So you are Admin of a Corby support site and you don't know Rose made that comment? Actually, I thought everyone knew and what Murray has supplied has been cleaned up as well. I know that somewhere is a more definitive reference to the event.
|
Dont insult me djwolf. Murrays article said absolutely nothing about Rose suggesting the Bali Police had planted the pot in Schapelles baggage.
NOTHING
You have made it real easy for me now. Seeing as you are going to insult me and insult my level of support for Schapelle then you can enjoy your first 7 point infraction.
Quote:
|
This was my fault - the word 'from' was a typo and should have been 'in'. That is, "the cut in the bag was made after the flight arrived IN Bali" not FROM Bali. Having said that it is clear this is personal for you.
|
Your typo does not change the meaning of what you said in any substantial way whatsoever. The essence of what you said remains the same. Here is your original quote.
Quote:
|
What we do know for sure is that the cut in the bag was made after the flight arrived from Bali since no marijuana had fallen through the cut into the outer bag - given the way baggage is handled the notion that it was cut prior to this borders on impossible.
|
Because no loose marijuana had fallen thru the cut in the bag we can say for sure that the cut was made in Bali can we? Only in your world are such assumptions possible. At every level of your argument you grab a situation and mold it to suit your theory.
Quote:
|
I'd like to ask you a question: without some kind of investigation or enquiry instigated by either the KRK or the Australian voters or both, how do you think we can best help Schapelle?
|
I am not interested in working with you on any level.